🔗 Share this article

The move by the DNC to block the publication regarding its internal post-election analysis concerning the 2024 election seems stunning however entirely predictable. Resistant to frank assessments, the DNC operates more like a communications shop rather than a political organization devoted to building grassroots capacities for winning elections.

A Climate Resistant to Internal Critique

Reluctant to break with the prevailing attitude demanding unity, the committee has stayed within the Biden-Harris shadow all through this past year. Making public the findings would have indicated whether party leaders truly desire to promote public discourse regarding the errors that enabled the former president to become president again. However, the DNC is proceeding as if there are no lessons to understand from the stunning loss of 2024.

Our guiding principle: will this lead to victory? If the answer is no, it is an unnecessary diversion from our fundamental goal," a rationale which was presented for withholding the analysis.

Major Failures an Analysis Could Have Examined

Any valuable post-mortem with any value would confront a series of difficult topics. This encompasses:

• Electoral Alienation: Failing to retain among millions of voters who supported the Democratic ticket in 2020 proved pivotal in the narrowly decided 2024 election.
• The Choice to Seek Re-election: The determined choice by the incumbent to seek re-election, and a very late withdrawal, has been criticized as denying the party's base of open primaries.
• Abandoning Core Democratic Voters: Amid rising costs, the electoral effort allegedly bowing to powerful financial backers without successfully attempting to address the role of big business.
• A Foreign Policy Impact: An unwillingness to reconsider a stance on a ongoing war is cited as alienating key demographic groups, notably with youth voters, Arab American communities, and Muslim Americans.
• Losing Young Voter Backing: Research demonstrates a major decline of votes for the candidate from young voters.

A Pattern Avoiding Accountability

The decision to withhold fits a recurring tendency of evading difficult realities. It echoes a situation where virtually every elected Democrat in Congress acquiesced to a sitting president's decision for seeking another term right up until a catastrophic campaign event led to a change.

At the same time, overwhelming numbers of the electorate had been continually telling pollsters that they did not want the incumbent to run again.

Financial Questions

A substantive analysis could examine matters regarding financial allocations, such as what sums flowed to insider consultants as well as advertising contractors during a campaign that burned through an enormous sum during the general election.

A Broader Problem

Ultimately, the suppression surrounding this report highlights a submission toward the established hierarchy who engineered a disastrous presidential campaign. The implication to ordinary supporters – which includes millions of loyal volunteers – appears to be that they do not be trusted to see what the leadership claim to have learned based on an analysis compiled from extensive interviews.

A political entity unable to publicly examine where it went wrong will struggle to escape the rut that proved so beneficial to their opponents.